国社@四川|袁隆平国际杂交水稻种业硅谷在成都开工建设
197 questions
0
votes
0
answers
26
views
Can recalcitrant desires be reduced to contradictory beliefs, or do they reveal something non-cognitive about desire?
In his paper Why Desires are Not Beliefs, Michiel Esseling critically engages with Alex Gregory’s “Desire-as-Belief” (DAB) thesis the view that desires are a subset of beliefs, namely, beliefs about ...
0
votes
0
answers
47
views
Are there writings on a similar thought about impetus being more primary than reason?
In my search for a deductive epistemology, attempting to reduce bias and presupposition regarding foundational questions for the purpose of rationally comparing and contrasting core belief systems (...
2
votes
6
answers
1k
views
Is there a moral component to rational belief?
One fairly effective atheist argument against some forms of Christianity is the unfairness of a God who would condemn people to eternal hell for harboring rational doubts about his existence. "...
0
votes
12
answers
606
views
Why do folks believe in free will despite no philosophical proof?
There isn't a single, universally accepted philosophical proof of free will. However, the majority of modern people believe in it. It raises other questions. How can a philosophical position reconcile ...
-2
votes
5
answers
209
views
Is there an objective answer to the question, "Does God exist"? [closed]
In this context, “God" is intended to mean a divine reality, regardless of any description thereof.
At first glance, this question may seem overly familiar or sufficiently exhausted. But wait—I ...
3
votes
5
answers
187
views
Can evidence with Bayesian reasoning change your priors?
My question is not about whether your prior beliefs should change to new beliefs under Bayesian reasoning, which is an obvious "yes." Rather, what I mean is: is there room in Bayesian ...
0
votes
3
answers
86
views
How can I establish what I believe, without reflecting on what to believe? [closed]
How can I establish what I believe, without reflecting on what to believe? Question may sound nonsense, but it is germane to my mental life, not a means to confuse myself, unless the answer is ...
2
votes
2
answers
177
views
Non-aristotelian logics for philosophers (references request)
Totally layman in logic and philosophy of logic question here.
I am interested in logics that can handle emotions and beliefs. I can't put it much more crearly than this: In real life, it's possible ...
6
votes
6
answers
4k
views
Why do most philosophers of religion believe in God? [closed]
When philosophers at large are surveyed, we observe this distribution:
N = 1771 (source)
But when we filter by area of specialization (AOS) = philosophy of religion, we observe this distribution ...
4
votes
8
answers
2k
views
Can healthy adult human beings live life without "beliefs" or "leaps of faith"?
There is a very insightful discussion on epistemological pluralism available at Is it epistemologically self-consistent to use the scientific method to justify some beliefs and non-scientific ...
0
votes
3
answers
116
views
Is it possible to justify differing confidences in our beliefs? [closed]
We all feel more confident in certain things more than others. For example, we may feel more confident that “the sun will rise tomorrow” than “I will die tomorrow.”
But how does one (or does it even ...
-3
votes
6
answers
199
views
Is it irrational to assign a probability to a metaphysical proposition? [closed]
One of the responses to Pascal’s Wager is that it may be meaningless to assign a probability to a certain metaphysical proposition such as God’s existence.
In this post about the assignment of ...
1
vote
9
answers
2k
views
What would it take for an AI to have beliefs?
This question is motivated by @Lowri's comment here:
And ChatGPT doesn't "rebut" anything. It just produces words. It doesn't believe those words. It doesn't think those words are true.
@...
4
votes
2
answers
147
views
Is any fictional knowledge purely a priori knowledge?
I suppose the alternative is that fictional knowledge is empirical.
Currently I’m thinking fictional knowledge is an important issue regarding the debate surrounding a priori vs a posteriori knowledge....
2
votes
2
answers
147
views
Are we epistemically inclined to believe whatever we want in philosophy? [duplicate]
By any belief, I of course do still mean beliefs that are internally consistent, since it would obviously make no sense to believe in square triangles.
As per wikipedia,
In epistemology, the ...